|
 Product Links 
|
|

Inside SRI

|
SRI-Newsletter |
 |
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive monthly specials, manufacturer's feature, and electronics news via email. |
|
|
|
See Our latest release of SRI-Newsletter here
|
|
View Our List of Archived Newsletter Articles
|
|

SRI Links

|
|
Visit our Sister Site,
 Distributor of Industrial Products
| |
|
Web Search .. Powered by;
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
With Europe's 2006 deadline of lead-free electronics looming on
the horizon, a global effort to examine and rework the supply
chain has begun. If manufacturers are to meet the July 2006
deadline, suppliers say they must redesign parts and change
manufacturing processes now. Companies are making educated
guesses, spending millions of dollars to prepare and struggling
to figure out which parts of the supply chain will shoulder
the burden. It's either that or do nothing. China and several
U.S. states are considering similar initiatives, that doing
nothing is considered the riskier alternative. "If you don't
have a lead-free action plan right now, you're way behind
the times," says Kenneth Stanvick, senior vice president of
consulting firm Design Chain Associates. The European Union (EU) has legislated a directive to prohibit
the use of lead (and five other substances) in electronics
beginning July 1, 2006. Many Asian countries are following
suit to ensure future access to the EU market. China is
currently developing a restriction on hazardous substances
that is very similar. Approximately 95% of South Korea's
electronic production companies are declaring participation
in the phase out of these chemicals. In the United States,
California is the only state currently restricting the
importation, manufacture, or sale of lead containing electronics.
Most companies do not necessarily want to change to
lead-free production, but are motivated by a combination
of factors. The WEEE/RoHS directives in Europe have
instilled fear of legislation that will prohibit the
use of lead in electronics soldering. Any country disallowing
electronic products with lead or other hazardous substances
will create a trade barrier. Marketing of a lead-free
program by many companies will lead to fears of being
caught behind. Many companies are also worried about
cost and reliability factors too.
Operating costs are increasing because some substitute
chemicals are more expensive than the hazardous chemicals
they replace. Companies also will face higher energy
bills, because alternative processes such as using lead-free
solder or brominated flame retardants require anywhere
from 6 to 18 percent more energy. The cost of educating
and training company personnel on the use of lead-free
alloys and qualifying lead-free parts are not inexpensive
ventures. As the production of lead-free components
ramps up to high volumes, at least some of these costs
should stabilize or drop, industry spokespersons agree.
In the connector industry, lead is often used in tin-lead
alloys as surface finish for solder terminations, or
as a protective coating for shell housings and on accessories.
The use of lead added to tin has been around for many
years as the best low-cost solution for soldering processes
- with an average solder temperature of 183°C. The alloy
provides better mechanical properties than pure tin
or lead. Industry experience shows that the lead added
to tin reduces the risk of whisker growth.
Tin whiskers are hair-like growths of near-perfect
crystalline structures of tin that grow from some electroplated
tin surfaces. The whiskers are believed to grow in response
to mechanical stresses acting within the tin layer.
Today, the exact process for tin whisker growth is still
unknown. Whiskers are a reliability concern for electronics,
because they can cause shorts and other problems. At
present, no official and safe test concerning whisker
formation is available for review in the highly debated
use of pure tin.
Here are additional photo samples of whiskers in Electromagnetic Relays, Ceramic Chip Capacitors, Terminal Rings, Hybrid Microcircuit, Microcircuit (DIP), Test Points and Connectors
Another concern for manufacturers is the labeling
requirements for lead-free components. Eco-labels are
visible product labels that identify products meeting
specific environmental requirements. Recognizing the
importance of environmental communications and the corresponding
potential for inaccurate and misleading environmental
claims, the International Standards Organization (ISO)
has undertaken efforts to provide standards and guidance
for environmental claims. For detailed information on
labeling programs, visit
http://leadfree.ipc.org/.
LINKS TO Eco-Labels
Canada http://www.tcodevelopment.com/pls/nvp/Document.Show?cid=776&mid=59
EU Eco-Mark http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/ecolabel/index_en.htm
Germany, Blue Angel http://www.blauer-engel.de/english/portal/portal.htm
Japan Eco-Mark http://www.ecomark.jp/english/
Nordic Swan http://www.svanen.nu/Eng/default.asp
Sweden, TCO http://www.tcodevelopment.com
U.S. Green Seal http://www.greenseal.org/about.htm
EIA White Paper on Eco-labeling http://leadfree.ipc.org/files/LF_3-5-1.pdf
The current movement in the worldwide electronic industry
toward lead (Pb) free electronics is based on environmental
and legislative, rather than technical, reasons. Pb
is considered to be a toxic substance that should be
eliminated from all electronics, just as the particularly
harmful organic compounds of Pb have been eliminated
from paint and gasoline. While making the environment
safer should be of utmost concern to manufacturers,
it is important to carefully consider all options and
consequences (product design, use, and disposition)
before transitioning to new technology, so as to ensure
that a proper long-term solution has been identified
|
**Specifications subject to changes**
|
|
|
|

Product Spotlight
 |
|
|
Miniature Bat Handle Switch, SPDT, 5A, 120VAC, ON-NONE-(ON), Epoxy Sealed
$2.55
MORE INFO
More NTE
|
|
|
Time Delay Relay - 10AMP - A/C 120V - 0.1 to 10 sec Delays
$103.44
MORE INFO
More NTE
|
|

Sponsored Ads
 |
|